We have read a few chapters from a book entitled digital mantras by Steven R Holtzman. In chapter 12 through 14 the author writes about the analysis of Kandinskys work by Lauzzana and Pocock-Williams. The two people go on to create a computer program that could mimic Kandinsky art by function of a set of rules developed by the program. In the next three decades this program would be able to draw from a blank canvas, abstract images with brilliant colors all by following a set of rules. By following these rules the computer was following a method of art making that many artist follow as well.
I began to find myself asking a lot of questions about this whole situation and relationship between the programmer, program and the artwork produced. Was the programmer the artist because he created the program that produced the art? Or was the program the artist because it had produced the art work? On my constant search for where the difference lies between art and design I find myself acquiring more knowledge about the topic at hand. The harder look the more I realize that may be one in the same and can depend greatly on the intent of the artist whether they are producing a piece of design or a piece of art.