Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Journal entry 5

We have read a few chapters from a book entitled digital mantras by Steven R Holtzman. In chapter 12 through 14 the author writes about the analysis of Kandinskys work by Lauzzana and Pocock-Williams. The two people go on to create a computer program that could mimic Kandinsky art by function of a set of rules developed by the program. In the next three decades this program would be able to draw from a blank canvas, abstract images with brilliant colors all by following a set of rules. By following these rules the computer was following a method of art making that many artist follow as well.

I began to find myself asking a lot of questions about this whole situation and relationship between the programmer, program and the artwork produced. Was the programmer the artist because he created the program that produced the art? Or was the program the artist because it had produced the art work? On my constant search for where the difference lies between art and design I find myself acquiring more knowledge about the topic at hand. The harder look the more I realize that may be one in the same and can depend greatly on the intent of the artist whether they are producing a piece of design or a piece of art.

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

journal entry 4

I have been doing a lot of research on the definitions or both are and design and the age old question what the difference between them is. During my research I came across a few interesting articles this one is off the AIGA website. The article discusses how designers use type and imagery to convey a certain message. It seems to me that fine art such as painting can revolve around that same definition. Artists often use imagery and type to convey a message. This article comes from another designer’s weblog which goes on to state that the main difference between art and design is their underlying purpose. It also states that art usually comes from within with no clear starting point and design and a distinct starting point but this does not take into account commissioned art. The debate between these two areas of study is very confusing to me and I would like to a little bit more research so that I better understand it. To combine my drawing talents with my design skill to me would be the ultimate accomplishment but without the knowledge of what separates the two I am in the dark.

Monday, October 3, 2011

Journal Entry 1

The first group critique I had with Jim was very enlightening. It was a really good thing to be able to see other peoples work from the thesis class. It was also interesting to see student work in other disciplines besides graphic design. The discussion I had with Jim about my art was really informative. As a graphic design major I included my design work in the critique but I also showed Jim some of my drawing. He came up with an interesting point. That I should try and combine my design work and my drawing into on uniform thought and then convey that trough my thesis project. I had never thought about doing anything like that and I think it is a great idea. This is something I will be exploring for the next couple of weeks.